One of the videos I've selected for this weeks video review was The Drawings of Michelangelo. The video
showcases several of Michelangelos work, but primarily focuses on his development as an artist and the inner workings of his thought processes. The video shows us several of Michelangelos works, as well as many of the design stages of these major works. There is much to be found in viewing the design stages, as we can really see what the artist was thinking in producing and planning. It's interesting, as mentioned in the article most of the sketches and design prototypes were destroyed, not through war or other destructive activity, but by the artist himself. One thing that was learned through the sketches was that much of
Michelangelos work and early learnings show much of the same techniques used by his mentor. Although
Michelangelo claims to owe little to his mentor, he owed much to his teachings. Also, we can see how exactly the artist came about some of his works.
The other video I selected was Leonardo da Vinci: The Mind of the Renaissance. I selected this video because I wanted to compare da Vinci and Michelangelo. Da Vincis life, while similar, seemed to be painted in the video in a much darker sense. Forced to cope with much political strife, da Vinci seemed to travel a lot more. Also, due to many other factors including his own doing, there seem to have been many works by Da Vinci which never were completed. This is a shame, as there may have been many more works from him for us to flounder over. Interestingly enough it seems that there was some dissent between these two men. This makes sense, as both existed during the same time and surely had to hear about how great the other was. It's too bad, perhaps with different circumstances the two may have worked together to create. Similarly, it seems both men left little to go on with regards to the stages of their work. Maybe it was due to the times or their own desire for perfection, but each man did much to prevent their sketches from remaining and being shown to the world.
The movies differ from the books in that rather than focusing on the works specifically and who they were being made for, the videos showed really a much deeper, more 'real' version of these men. It questioned and focused on their inner workings, and really how their work correlated with their stage in life. The book gave a much more paper man type feel to the artists, and seems to have forgotten that in light of their accomplishments, they also suffered and experienced what we all do. It was a much more relatable way to get to 'know' the artists. I feel that the videos did this very well, even if the video on Leonardo seemed rather dark and sort of depressing.
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Video Reviews MOD 8
The video more human than human was quite interesting. The majority of the video was centered on the expanse and use of art in Egyptian culture. This is probably because Egyptian culture is really the first and oldest widespead use of art in a culture that has endured through the ages. The video was investigating not only how art was used in the past but actually why humans show art in the way we do. One factor primarily centered on humanities natural engrained desire to accentuate varios portions of the human anatomy in representational way. Before this and the reading I hadnt really fully understood the terminology realistic, unrealistic, representational.
The video I selected to watch was The greek awakening. After watching the first video I wanted to see the greek cultures art history more specifically and in more depth. This video focused more on specifically how the greek culture demonstrated art and the parthenon. It showed how the greek view of art was effected by their culture, and really how western civilization was sprouted sort of out of a Greek beginning.
The videos were similar to the text in that both showed the development of art over time, while also showing that even if thousands of years go by, we as humans have a tendency to revert to many of the same styles or similar creations. They also both show that while culture has a great effect on how we specifically portray ourselves and our art, there are similarities that span not only thousands of years but thousands of miles. Interestingly enough that the same type of exagerations are shown in different cultures who may have never had interactions with each other.
I believe showing the history and most basic functions of any subject are vital to a full understanding of other aspects of the field. These vidoes, to me, provide this knowledge and I find them very interesting. Without really seeeing art from where it began, we cant fully understand it.
The video I selected to watch was The greek awakening. After watching the first video I wanted to see the greek cultures art history more specifically and in more depth. This video focused more on specifically how the greek culture demonstrated art and the parthenon. It showed how the greek view of art was effected by their culture, and really how western civilization was sprouted sort of out of a Greek beginning.
The videos were similar to the text in that both showed the development of art over time, while also showing that even if thousands of years go by, we as humans have a tendency to revert to many of the same styles or similar creations. They also both show that while culture has a great effect on how we specifically portray ourselves and our art, there are similarities that span not only thousands of years but thousands of miles. Interestingly enough that the same type of exagerations are shown in different cultures who may have never had interactions with each other.
I believe showing the history and most basic functions of any subject are vital to a full understanding of other aspects of the field. These vidoes, to me, provide this knowledge and I find them very interesting. Without really seeeing art from where it began, we cant fully understand it.
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
M7, and artiswhereyoumakeit video review
Hey there!
One of the videos I watched was on the science of architecture. Basically, the video demonstrated a lot of the technicality behind some structural designs, and how different designs require different materials. Prestressed concrete for example can provide a much stronger final product than regular concrete. Also, it can allow for a much larger variety of designs based on it's composition.
The other video I watched was on the last call for planet earth. It composed of several different architects explaining in their own opinion how the architecture of various buildings can have a positive effect on the environment. I guess it wasnt so much a positive effect but rather less of a negative effect. Their design attempted to incorporate natural provisions in order to have a lesser effect on the environment as well as less energy use. The most interesting part of this video (to me) was the federal building that did not have an overrideable climate control system. If the buildings functions did not provide for a perfect climate for the inhabitants, than pretty much just too bad for them. The architect stated that this is not a big deal because the energy usage is less of a personal preference and more of a green status...to me it seemed kinda like a little BS though, and likely it was just because the building could only function so well without the inclusion of a modern HVAC system.
The videos complimented the reading well. I felt that, as was the case with previous chapters, the reading provides a much more theoretical and 'art' perspective. It focused on elements and thought behind the structures where the videos also provided a lot of material regarding the specifics of its systems construction and functionality.
I tried to choose the video on Roman architecture but it was no longer available on the website. The last chance for planet earth I chose because I've always had a small interest in 'green' living. It typically involves a very minimalist style, but some of the designs in the video were large scale which was pretty neat. Also the science of architecture focused a lot on the physical construction, which I am a fan of and do a lot it myself(although on a much smaller scale)
One of the videos I watched was on the science of architecture. Basically, the video demonstrated a lot of the technicality behind some structural designs, and how different designs require different materials. Prestressed concrete for example can provide a much stronger final product than regular concrete. Also, it can allow for a much larger variety of designs based on it's composition.
The other video I watched was on the last call for planet earth. It composed of several different architects explaining in their own opinion how the architecture of various buildings can have a positive effect on the environment. I guess it wasnt so much a positive effect but rather less of a negative effect. Their design attempted to incorporate natural provisions in order to have a lesser effect on the environment as well as less energy use. The most interesting part of this video (to me) was the federal building that did not have an overrideable climate control system. If the buildings functions did not provide for a perfect climate for the inhabitants, than pretty much just too bad for them. The architect stated that this is not a big deal because the energy usage is less of a personal preference and more of a green status...to me it seemed kinda like a little BS though, and likely it was just because the building could only function so well without the inclusion of a modern HVAC system.
The videos complimented the reading well. I felt that, as was the case with previous chapters, the reading provides a much more theoretical and 'art' perspective. It focused on elements and thought behind the structures where the videos also provided a lot of material regarding the specifics of its systems construction and functionality.
I tried to choose the video on Roman architecture but it was no longer available on the website. The last chance for planet earth I chose because I've always had a small interest in 'green' living. It typically involves a very minimalist style, but some of the designs in the video were large scale which was pretty neat. Also the science of architecture focused a lot on the physical construction, which I am a fan of and do a lot it myself(although on a much smaller scale)
Tuesday, October 6, 2015
Peer Review Fun
http://bryannagraham.blogspot.com/
Annnnnnnnes Blog
Well I took a look at a couple other peoples blogs and I have to say it was pretty enjoyable! Normally when I look at art i have a tough time trying to figure out really what the heck is going on. Not sure if it's my limited experience in the matter or what but this was neat and comprehensible.
Firstly I was able to see how others have done the same things that I did, but in a totally different way! I could compare my processes to what their processes might have been (although there were not good descriptions on the photos in the Photoshop slideshow of how they came about taking the photo and applying an element) I think maybe people should look at what they are taking a picture of rather than look for a picture that represents and element....or maybe do both and the outcome would be different...idk if this is clear or not but...I agreed with most of what others had posted but not entirely, I think some of the pictures I maybe had a tough time identifying with the proposed element.
One of my peer reviews did have the same art in it! Bryanna and I both took a look at the 'Cinema art exhibit and both wondered what was going on in it! She wondered more about the R while I went I little outlandish with my thinking but we both were curious about it!
I really liked a couple of annnnnnnes pictues of the elements. I thought they were really creative and I could see what she was thinking when she took them. I would definitely have seen the same thing and woulda been right on the same page!
Truly I really liked this activity. As I said before I am kinda having a tough time looking into art for more than what I see physically when I look at it. In this, I'm able to look and say "okay I was thinking this when I portrayed (or attempted to portray...!!lol ) this element, what were they thinking" and then when I look at their picture I can 'get it'. Also the knox review was pretty cool too, although again with the abstract art thing I sort of get lost...but it makes it easier when someone on 'my level' tells what they are thinking rather than an art reviewer critique where when I read it I'm all like confused, and my brain is scrambled eggs from the scrambled or fried work at the exhibit.
oh and I think I'm going to be able to clear up a little misconception for someone because I videod the video art and I dont think they watched it all the way through! Very cool coincidence!
Annnnnnnnes Blog
Well I took a look at a couple other peoples blogs and I have to say it was pretty enjoyable! Normally when I look at art i have a tough time trying to figure out really what the heck is going on. Not sure if it's my limited experience in the matter or what but this was neat and comprehensible.
Firstly I was able to see how others have done the same things that I did, but in a totally different way! I could compare my processes to what their processes might have been (although there were not good descriptions on the photos in the Photoshop slideshow of how they came about taking the photo and applying an element) I think maybe people should look at what they are taking a picture of rather than look for a picture that represents and element....or maybe do both and the outcome would be different...idk if this is clear or not but...I agreed with most of what others had posted but not entirely, I think some of the pictures I maybe had a tough time identifying with the proposed element.
One of my peer reviews did have the same art in it! Bryanna and I both took a look at the 'Cinema art exhibit and both wondered what was going on in it! She wondered more about the R while I went I little outlandish with my thinking but we both were curious about it!
I really liked a couple of annnnnnnes pictues of the elements. I thought they were really creative and I could see what she was thinking when she took them. I would definitely have seen the same thing and woulda been right on the same page!
Truly I really liked this activity. As I said before I am kinda having a tough time looking into art for more than what I see physically when I look at it. In this, I'm able to look and say "okay I was thinking this when I portrayed (or attempted to portray...!!lol ) this element, what were they thinking" and then when I look at their picture I can 'get it'. Also the knox review was pretty cool too, although again with the abstract art thing I sort of get lost...but it makes it easier when someone on 'my level' tells what they are thinking rather than an art reviewer critique where when I read it I'm all like confused, and my brain is scrambled eggs from the scrambled or fried work at the exhibit.
oh and I think I'm going to be able to clear up a little misconception for someone because I videod the video art and I dont think they watched it all the way through! Very cool coincidence!
Glass, ceremics, and how a mini-sculpt grows up
The video "Through the eyes of a sculptor" provided some deep insight on the processes and depth that many go through in order to reach the finale of their work. I'd not realized how thorough the process was prior to the video. I figured there was a guy out there and he chizzled away at a block and you pretty much got what you got. Similar to the videos on logos however, there is really an intricate process involving many steps, combining different people with different specialties. I really liked how the initial phases used an actual model in one portion of the video. The sculptor then took this smaller sculpt and made a mold, he used the mold to make a plaster model of the sculpt, and then took that sculpt to someone else to enlarge it! Also the process and history of mining the stone for use was pretty interesting, although I wouldnt want to be the guy laying the cribbing for the giant shipment of marble coming down a hill...
The video on glass and ceramic also provided some useful information. I'd previously watched some videos on glass art, and was hoping there would be some information on commercial glass production. Also, I'm still curious to find out how the louve (sp?) made their glass so clear. The section on ceramic was very interesting though! I wouldn't have guessed that you mix up a goop and pour it into a form to make some plates! kinda like how the glass was made too, but you heat that goop up pretty hawt.
The readings in the book provided many more unique and contemporary examples than were shown in the video, as the video focused mostly on classical reproductions. Also where the video left off in classical the book picked up into ancient sculpts. Also, when it came to glass the video didn't really cover too many different types of art relating to glass but rather it's function in modern construction and utility purposes.
I personally enjoyed the films. When it comes to truly understanding any topic, it is important to have a solid foundation of all of the aspects of that topic as opposed to the intricacies. The videos provided a solid point from which to stand and further delve into their individual subjects. Coming from someone who is not 'artsy', I can say that they make me feel more equipped to look at and understand the topics and even to talk to others about them.
Sunday, October 4, 2015
Knox Gallery Visit
I had a pretty enjoyable time at the gallery, although I must admit that contemporary art is not my preferred type and there is quite a bit of this abstract in the gallery.
I had a couple pieces that I found a connection with, which actually surprised me because I have somewhat of a hard time 'feeling' art.
One piece was this painting Electric by Edward Ruscha. It is an oil painting on canvas. I am a worker in the electric field, and this caught my eye and seemed to reflect the 'modern' view of electric from the past, like a throwback. I was surprised to realize that it actually was from way back, 1963
Another painting that I felt a part of was of a man on a bridge in a small seemingly empty town. Again, it was the power structures in the backround that got my attention and interest. I wondered about how the lines were installed and the ordeals that people had gone through. Although the painter probably wasnt knowledgable in electrical utility work, it was neat to see how the painting pretty accurately reflected current practices....i.e. old equipment that is no longer used has been stripped, but the supports that used to hole it remain.
For some reason that I cannot figure out, this random picture caught my attention and I keep thinking about it. The piece is Scrambled Eggs, and it's a bunch of randomness with an egg-looking thing on it. The 'egg' (cooked over-medium possibly) is what actually caught my attention and I laughed when I saw the name of the piece. I didnt particularly like it, but it definitely left an impression on me.
I was also impressed by a sci-fi kinda painting called La voix des airs (The voice of space), 1928. The painting almost looks like a technological pacman surrounded by darkness. It gives the impression of something in the midst of nothing. I like sci-fi stuff and thought it was interesting.
There were two seperate pieces that seemed correlated to me, one was a sculpt and the other a painting titled George Segal with Cinema, by Fred McDarrah. When I saw the sculpt initially I was impressed. The light of the cinema board really grabbed my attention. As I looked to the figure and the empty board I began to wonder. With just an 'R' on the board (okay I guess not empty then!) I thought about what movie might be being shown at the theater, what letters might the man be putting up next? I wondered if it was his first time setting up the lettering on the board, or if he'd done it before and knew a good way of accomplishing his task. I wondered if there were many cobwebs and bugs in the sign and around it, and it the man liked his job. When I was the painting (Gelatin silver print) There were two men. Possibly the other man was out getting his ladder while the first (guy in the sculpt) started the lettering, but then I could see the mans arm was still outstretched, so he wouldn't stay in that position waiting for the other man. Then I wondered back to the sculpture itself....what if the sculpture was a capture of the mans psyche at that exact moment....even though the other man was there the whole time, the first man did not think about him or 'realize' him.... instead, he just went about his work and his thoughts in his own mind. :)
Lastly, Emily Bouchards oil on canvas of the scene Winter. While the piece is very desolate and empty, the road itself tickled my imagination. Where did it go? Who had kept it clear of the snow? Did the author even think that someone must have cleared the snow, or did they just paint a winter scene that was in their mind and not give any of this a second thought.
I've always thought that artists should publish documents with their art detailing the inner workings of their minds when they do their works. On that note though, I can understand why many would strongly disagree with this notion. Often we like to see what we want in art, regardless of the authors intentions. I think this ability to interpret a lot allows an artists work to reach a much wider audience, and really allows them to 'talk' to each person that views their work separately, and in a sense very personally. :)
I had a couple pieces that I found a connection with, which actually surprised me because I have somewhat of a hard time 'feeling' art.
One piece was this painting Electric by Edward Ruscha. It is an oil painting on canvas. I am a worker in the electric field, and this caught my eye and seemed to reflect the 'modern' view of electric from the past, like a throwback. I was surprised to realize that it actually was from way back, 1963
Another painting that I felt a part of was of a man on a bridge in a small seemingly empty town. Again, it was the power structures in the backround that got my attention and interest. I wondered about how the lines were installed and the ordeals that people had gone through. Although the painter probably wasnt knowledgable in electrical utility work, it was neat to see how the painting pretty accurately reflected current practices....i.e. old equipment that is no longer used has been stripped, but the supports that used to hole it remain.
For some reason that I cannot figure out, this random picture caught my attention and I keep thinking about it. The piece is Scrambled Eggs, and it's a bunch of randomness with an egg-looking thing on it. The 'egg' (cooked over-medium possibly) is what actually caught my attention and I laughed when I saw the name of the piece. I didnt particularly like it, but it definitely left an impression on me.
I was also impressed by a sci-fi kinda painting called La voix des airs (The voice of space), 1928. The painting almost looks like a technological pacman surrounded by darkness. It gives the impression of something in the midst of nothing. I like sci-fi stuff and thought it was interesting.
There were two seperate pieces that seemed correlated to me, one was a sculpt and the other a painting titled George Segal with Cinema, by Fred McDarrah. When I saw the sculpt initially I was impressed. The light of the cinema board really grabbed my attention. As I looked to the figure and the empty board I began to wonder. With just an 'R' on the board (okay I guess not empty then!) I thought about what movie might be being shown at the theater, what letters might the man be putting up next? I wondered if it was his first time setting up the lettering on the board, or if he'd done it before and knew a good way of accomplishing his task. I wondered if there were many cobwebs and bugs in the sign and around it, and it the man liked his job. When I was the painting (Gelatin silver print) There were two men. Possibly the other man was out getting his ladder while the first (guy in the sculpt) started the lettering, but then I could see the mans arm was still outstretched, so he wouldn't stay in that position waiting for the other man. Then I wondered back to the sculpture itself....what if the sculpture was a capture of the mans psyche at that exact moment....even though the other man was there the whole time, the first man did not think about him or 'realize' him.... instead, he just went about his work and his thoughts in his own mind. :)
Lastly, Emily Bouchards oil on canvas of the scene Winter. While the piece is very desolate and empty, the road itself tickled my imagination. Where did it go? Who had kept it clear of the snow? Did the author even think that someone must have cleared the snow, or did they just paint a winter scene that was in their mind and not give any of this a second thought.
I've always thought that artists should publish documents with their art detailing the inner workings of their minds when they do their works. On that note though, I can understand why many would strongly disagree with this notion. Often we like to see what we want in art, regardless of the authors intentions. I think this ability to interpret a lot allows an artists work to reach a much wider audience, and really allows them to 'talk' to each person that views their work separately, and in a sense very personally. :)
Thursday, October 1, 2015
I don't know why this site load my images upsidedown....anywho!
link to photobucket...
So I tried to follow the same steps as seen in the logo creation media. What is my logo to represent..what do I want to show? I brainstormed some designed and combined my final logo for myself. I used my name to come up with an alphanumeric representation of me. CRONE...CR ONE....CR1...The red was chosen to show an emphasis on that portion of the logo...that is who I am, myself, so I made it bold. The blue bar at the bottom gives a strong foundation for the lettering. Without it, the lettering floats and doesnt really seem to stable. I'm a professional in the electrical field, so I put the lightning bolt in there. I also think that the yellow of the lightning bolt (and the bolt itself) shows energy and is a good symbol to give some life to my Logo!
I learned a lot about the creative process involved in logos, I had no idea how much went into creating a simple design. I liked the videos. They were enjoyable and provided me with a lot of interesting information. I really liked seeing the back and forth between the company who wanted the logo made and the company making the logo. It was interesting to see how they reacted to the feedback. Also I'd like to try the sandwich spread :)
photo bucket properly rotated pics
I don't know why this site load my images upsidedown....anywho!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)